Chief Justice of India, D Y Chandrachud, reprimanded an advocate for trying to seek a change in a court order that hadn’t been signed by the judges. The CJI expressed his anger when he discovered that the lawyer had referred to notes from the court master.
Related Posts
Jinnah not a fundamentalist, used to drink wine, eat pork: Gundu Rao
Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao highlights stark contrasts between Jinnah and Savarkar, describing Jinnah as non-fundamentalist while labeling Savarkar as a fundamentalist and criticizes the […]
Tech company CEO arrested in $366 million crypto scam
South Korean CEO Byun Young-oh was arrested for allegedly running a $366 million Ponzi scheme through his cryptocurrency platform, Wakon. The scheme, targeting elderly citizens […]
Why Trudeau’s party MPs want him to quit as Canada PM by October 28
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau faces a significant internal challenge as fellow party members urged him to consider resignation during a private Liberal caucus meeting. […]