The Supreme Court declined the plea of parents seeking passive euthanasia for their 30-year-old son who has been in a vegetative state for 11 years. The court clarified that removal of the Ryles tube, used for feeding, does not constitute passive euthanasia. Instead, it sought advice from the government for a long-term care solution.
Related Posts
‘Really embarrassing’: Setback for Xi as China’s new nuke sub sinks at Wuhan port
China’s newest nuclear-powered attack submarine, identified as a Zhou-class submarine, sank at a pier during construction between May and June. This incident occurred at the […]
5.4% GDP growth doesn’t indicate systemic slowdown: FM Sitharaman
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman asserted that the slower second-quarter growth doesn’t signal a systemic slowdown, attributing it to reduced public spending during the election season. […]
Pancakes & a call: How Kamala Harris learned of Biden’s decision to step back
Vice President and Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris, in an interview with CNN, described how she was notified of President Joe Biden’s decision not to […]